sidebar sidebar2017 sidebarALL
news news1 news2 news3 notes
Facebook (not) sacred transmission scholars ASullivan WIN10
Wearing masks in February, 2025 From a NYTimes interview with science journalist Ed Yong February 22, 2025 You’ve been clear in saying that Covid has not gone away. You ask people to wear masks at your events. But that attitude is not necessarily where the rest of the world is. How do you think about continuing to take precautions and advising others to do so when it feels as if society has moved on? I do it for a bunch of reasons. Firstly, I have learned that I enjoy not being sick. I know that the cost of long Covid is real and substantial, and I don’t want to run that risk lightly. I also know that I have many friends and people I’m close to who are immunocompromised. So for the sake of the people around me, I also don’t want to get sick. When I do events, I wear a mask for those reasons, and because I know that every time I do a talk, while the vast majority of people in the audience have probably moved on, there are going to be other people who haven’t. I think it makes a huge difference to them to have the person at the front of the stage wear a mask. It tells them, It’s not weird. So I do it for that reason, too. In terms of holding this line at a point when a large swath of society has moved on, I have written a lot about the panic-neglect cycle. What’s that? The idea is, a crisis happens. Let’s say a new epidemic. Attention and resources flow toward that, people take it seriously, freak out, and then once the problem abates, so, too, does everything else. The resources dwindle, the attention goes away and we lapse into the same level of unpreparedness that led to the panic in the first place. This is real. I’ve seen it through my reporting. I’ve seen it for Ebola, for Covid — you name it. Bird flu? Sure, why not? All of which is to say, for all of those reasons, I don’t feel self-conscious about still being cautious at a time when most people aren’t. I personally don’t want to lapse into the neglect phase, because I don’t think it’s warranted. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/22/magazine/ed-yong-interview.html #MuskUSAID Cruelty from the richest man in the world, who made more money since Trump was elected than the entire USAID budget which has provided relief to the suffering, hope for others, and long-term security for the US through the relationships it has built-- Musk, asking for admiration as he sacrificed going to parties while medicine spoils, lives disrupted, people dying . . . . 2025 0203 Elon Musk @elonmusk We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper. Could gone to some great parties. Did that instead. Fact-CheckACT-CHECK on USAID: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/08/us/politics/usaid-funding-trump-fact-check.html An African Assessment: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/08/world/africa/usaid-africa-trump-musk.html Elon: the Ketamine Kid , Emperor of the World Elon (with businesses far and wide and who came to the US illegally) is now interferring with German, British, and Italian governments as well as here. Unelected Elon Musk, the word's richest man, lie after lie. Vox Musk, Vox Dei. His posts on X have received a total of 133 billion views during aperiod late last year. That’s 15 times Donald Trump’s audience in the same period and more than 16 times the combined reach of all accounts belonging to members of the incoming Congress. America's plutocracy now easily visible Elon's associates Thanks again, corrupt Supreme Court and ACLU, for proudly proclaiming that corporate money = free speech. Kakistocracy refers to a government run by the least qualified or most unfit individuals, often characterized by corruption and incompetence. The term comes from the Greek word "kakistos," meaning "worst," and "kratos," meaning "power" or "rule." Jimmy Carter: “Too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption. Human identity is no longer defined by what one does, but by what one owns. But we’ve discovered that owning things and consuming things does not satisfy our longing for meaning.” --then President, Jimmy Carter, 1979. Now a man who named a gold-tinged tower after himself has become our president. ENOUGH Joseph Heller, an important and funny writer now dead, and I were at a party given by a billionaire on Shelter Island. I said, “Joe, how does it make you feel to know that our host only yesterday may have made more money than your novel ‘Catch-22’ has earned in its entire history?” And Joe said, “I’ve got something he can never have.” And I said, “What on earth could that be, Joe?” And Joe said, “The knowledge that I’ve got enough.” Not bad! Rest in peace!” — Kurt Vonnegut The history of the world since at least the French Revolution is that rapid disruption makes governments cataclysmically worse. Trump, the anti-institutionalist, is creating an electoral monarchy, a system in which all power is personalized and held in his hands. That’s a recipe for distorted information flows, corruption, instability and administrative impotence. As we’ve seen over and over again down the centuries, there’s a big difference between people who operate in the spirit of disruption and those who operate in the spirit of reform. --David Brooks https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/23/opinion/trump-mckinley-populism.html I most circumstances, I favor gradual change rather than disruption . . . RE: executive orders and government efficiency a la Musk -- “Do not remove a fence until you know why it was put up in the first place.” TRUMP January 6 PARDONS There is great value to him [Trump] in having members of these groups released, doubly loyal to him, and eager to carry out his agenda and silence his critics through violence. Mr. Trump has shown his willingness to use his pardon power, and little stops him from doing so again. What might happen next? Vigilantes could harass, assault or even kill perceived enemies of the state. Under the thin pretext that these vigilantes were acting in self-defense, the president could pardon them for federal crimes, or pressure pliant governors to do the same for state ones. In such a scenario, the president could put those loyal to him above the law, quite literally. This kind of violence was a part of our past; it may be a part of our future. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/24/opinion/trump-pardon-jan-6-capitol.html |